WASHINGTON (AP) — A divided Supreme Court ruled Thursday that authorities do not have to provide a quick hearing when they seize cars and other property used in drug crimes, even when the property belongs to so-called innocent owners. By a 6-3 vote, the justices rejected the claims of two Alabama women who had to wait more than a year for their cars to be returned. Police had stopped the cars when they were being driven by other people and, after finding drugs, seized the vehicles. Civil forfeiture allows authorities to take someone’s property, without having to prove that it has been used for illicit purposes. Critics of the practice describe it as “legalized theft.” Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote for the conservative majority that a civil forfeiture hearing to determine whether an owner will lose the property permanently must be timely. But he said the Constitution does not also require a separate hearing about whether police may keep cars or other property in the meantime. |
BBC Countryfile star Adam Henson's wife wrote heartbreaking goodbye letters after cancer diagnosisDefending champion South Carolina to open season in Las Vegas against MichiganSale continues dominant run as Braves beat Padres 3Greek judge dismisses case against 9 Egyptians accused of causing a deadly shipwreckDame Judi Dench's tears as she receives Sycamore Gap tree seedling at Chelsea Flower ShowEleanor Tomlinson puts on a leggy display in sparkly black minidress as she joins coJerry Seinfeld's standJennifer Garner visits exTrump or Biden? Either way, US seems poised to preserve heavy tariffs on importsI'm a cruise ship worker...these are the FIVE things smart passengers always do onboard